#44293: "Bring turn based players back to the table between step 2/3 of Epidemic cards (Rather than after 3)"
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Por favor revisa se xa hai un informe sobre o mesmo tema
De ser afirmativo, por favor VOTA por este informe. Aos informes con máis votos se lles da PRIORIDADE!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Descrición detallada
• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Por favor, explica o que querÃas facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquÃ.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é asÃ, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
• Qué habÃa na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
• Qué acción de xogo querÃas realizar?
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?
• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquÃ.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquÃ.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é asÃ, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
Counting cards/knowing how many infection cards just went back onto the top of your deck alone can be a huge piece of information in Pandemic. Knowing which cards these were is way more powerful than knowing how many alone, and serves as a cornerstone in some of the planning at higher difficulties -- inspection of this discard pile right before it's shuffled usually yields very useful information (knowing what, and exactly which threats are about to be shuffled in)
For example, imagine two epidemics close to each other but on different turns, with four Infection cards in discard. Knowing that there were only 4 Infection cards in the discard pile as you go to resolve the shuffle of an Epidemic (intensify) may affect several decisions on the next couple turns. If your infection rate is now three, and the city infected via the Epidemic card was not one of the three drawn this turn you KNOW it is the next card, this is VERY useful information that is easily missed in a turn-based game.
Unfortunately in a turn-based game the other players are called back to the table to see an Epidemic AFTER the discard pile is shuffled, therefore lack information about what was just shuffled. When playing turn-based ​especially when you've got multiple on the go it can be very hard to track this; the information could in theory be re-constructed from logs, but this is mentally taxing.
This suggestion is that in a turn-based game the players are called back to the table after step two, but before step three of an Epidemic card being resolved; rather than after step three has been resolved which seems to be the case right now. (i.e. Bring them back at the same timing window as Resilient Population is playable)
This would also mean the players would need to press a confirm button (this functionality could be altered with a player option) so that the game does not automatically advance once the final person views the table.
The new message might look something like the following "A new Epidemic has occurred. The Infection discard pile is about to be shuffled once all players confirm. Resilient Population may be played now (if available). [Confirm]"• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v91
Historial de informes
Both are in service of allowing more information to turn-based players about what was in the discard pile that just got shuffled as this information is easily missed.
In a game played IRL we will always use the privilege provided to us by the rules ("Players may freely examine either discard pile at any time") to ensure we know, and then track what is being shuffled and placed on the Infection draw pile
Engade a este informe
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquÃ.