• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou

Move 220 & Move 223

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

Move 220 & Move 223

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

Chiefs in power get 2 consecutive turns only when in 1v1.
If the 2nd turn should be granted immediately, then it is inconsistent. Some games haven't given the 2nd consecutive move right after the Chief-in-power eliminated the 3rd Chief.

I do not remember the table number, but the difference was elimination by entrapment(this table) and elimination by a piece.

• Cal é o teu navegador?