• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

Move #97

When I activeted the Sabotage Consipracy, the Conflict Pawn should have gone 2 backwards.

In this specific case, it should have destroyed the Minerva Shield.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

As you can see on the FAQ published by the publisher of the game (www.rprod.com/en/7-wonders-duel/faq), Conflict Shields are NOT considered as instant effect anymore.

This means that the Conflict Pawn should go backward if you destroy a Wonder that provides Conflict Shields, such as The Colossus.

This rule was previously discussed even on the BGA forum in 2020 (forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?t=17932), but in the last 2 years the publisher widely explained that now the Conflict Shield are NOT considered as instant effect anymore, therefore they are affected by cards such as Sabotage or Anubi that can destroy Wonders which provide Conflict Shields.

• Cal é o teu navegador?