• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?

• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

Playing in person, picking cluegiver would typically be done randomly from all the players who express interest.

I would like to see an option for picking cluegiver that is similar to that.
I have a few ideas for how this can be done:

1. The options below could be done either as a new option: “allow rejecting cluegiver role” (or “players opt into clue giving”) true/false.
Or as a separate cluegiver selection method (“random, rejecting allowed”)

2. Before dealing their hand, ask the chosen cluegiver to Accept the role or pass on it. (If everyone else passes, the last person will instead be told they are cluegiver because they are the only remaining player.)

3. At the start, ask each player if they want a chance to be cluegiver.
After all players say yes or no, pick a cluegiver from those who say Yes.

• Cal é o teu navegador?