Todos os informes
#49340: "Tournament creates too many tables with minimum player count"
implemented: Esta suxestión xa foi implementada
1
Sobre qué é este informe?
BGA sitio web
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Suxestión: na miña opinión, o seguinte melloraría enormemente o sitio web
Descrición detallada
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
When creating a tournament for a multiplayer game, you can specify two quantities: the Number of Players in a Match and the Number of Players in a Match (minimum). When the tournament starts, it should create tables so that all players are playing (if possible) and most of the tables have the desired player count, not the minimum player count. Yet in many tournaments, I have seen that the algorithm creates far too many tables with the minimum (undesired) player count. A detailed example is below.• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
Historial de informes
27. Set 2021 16:59 • blockmonoid • Esta suxestión aínda non foi analizada polos desenvolvedores:
An example tournament: boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=89107
There were 81 players. The Number of Players in a Match was 4, the minimum was 3. So the optimal configuration would be:
18 four-player tables and 3 three-player tables (81= 4*18+3*3)
Instead, the first round of the tournament had:
9 four-player tables and 15 three-player tables (81= 4*9+3*15)
I don't even know how the algorithm decided on this configuration, since it shows no preference between 4- and 3-player tables. But the result was that an extra 36=3*12 players were playing at 3-player tables in the tournament, when they could have been at 4-player tables. For a game like For Sale, that's a big difference, since 4-player is a good player count, but 3-player is quite bad.
There were 81 players. The Number of Players in a Match was 4, the minimum was 3. So the optimal configuration would be:
18 four-player tables and 3 three-player tables (81= 4*18+3*3)
Instead, the first round of the tournament had:
9 four-player tables and 15 three-player tables (81= 4*9+3*15)
I don't even know how the algorithm decided on this configuration, since it shows no preference between 4- and 3-player tables. But the result was that an extra 36=3*12 players were playing at 3-player tables in the tournament, when they could have been at 4-player tables. For a game like For Sale, that's a big difference, since 4-player is a good player count, but 3-player is quite bad.
31. Xan 2023 11:16 • Archduke • Esta suxestión xa foi implementada:
Implemented (release notes: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=133530#p133530)
Engade a este informe
Por favor engade aquí calquera cousa que sexa relevante para reproducir este erro ou entender a túa suxestión:
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
