• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?

• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

Since there is no benefit to not take the action of the spy (Steal 1 money), whenever possible the spy should just work automatically:

a.) When there is only a single card next to the spy, the action should execute automatically.
b.) If there are two cards next to the spy but one is from the own family, it doesn't make sense to ask the player to confirm.

• Cal é o teu navegador?