#17548: "not feeding the meeples at all gives an unfair advantage"
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Por favor revisa se xa hai un informe sobre o mesmo tema
De ser afirmativo, por favor VOTA por este informe. Aos informes con máis votos se lles da PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrición detallada
-
• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?
-
• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
-
• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
Hi, I just had a game of Stone Age where one player did not feed his people at all. So, he got 10 points minus per round. but SO WHAT, these 10 points would have been gone anyway for 5 meeples (2 points per food point). With more people, he even had an advantage over the people feeind their meeples. That´s a BIIIG hole in the rules and should be mended!
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
Historial de informes
I already have rejected similar request in the past, it seems that people are not looking to rejected request before creating a new one, so I leave this one opened. But it won't be done.
It's not so easy to do : you lose 10 points every round, you refuse to win points by agriculture level, and you let other players have agriculture very easily.
As mentioned by admitted, in 2-player, is usually suicide in high-level games; I've seen instances where a temporary 10-pt sacrifice was useful, but the pure "get babies and to heck with food" philosophy does not work well enough to beat 400's and up.
Engade a este informe
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
