• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

At move 156, the green team (declaring team for hand 3) should have received the game bonus of 300 points rather than 50 points, as the contract points they had scored to that point exceeded 100. At the game's end the other (blue) team should have received 100 points.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

As currently implemented on BGA, scoring in Chicago bridge does not accumulate part scores across games. However, both Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(bridge_card_game) – and Pagat – www.pagat.com/auctionwhist/bridge.html#chicago – state that part scores *do* accumulate and game bonuses are awarded as in duplicate bridge, with the size of the game bonus based on the declaring side's vulnerability when the game was completed. Furthermore, 100 points are awarded for a part score at the end of a deal.

• Cal é o teu navegador?