#163396: "Text hard to read due to low resolution assets"
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Por favor revisa se xa hai un informe sobre o mesmo tema
De ser afirmativo, por favor VOTA por este informe. Aos informes con máis votos se lles da PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrición detallada
-
• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
-
• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
-
• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
-
• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?
-
• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
-
• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
-
• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. -
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
(Copying my comment from this thread: boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=41661)
Agreed, would also like to get some insight into the reason behind this and whether it would be possible for the developer(s) to replace all assets with higher resolution ones. It is the only aspect of this implementation that detracts from the experience for me personally.
There are many other games with huge decks of unique cards so I don't think this is a storage / network bandwidth limitation.
You can see when zooming in on a card that the artwork looks mostly ok but the text has severe compression artifacts, making the game as a whole less accessible. A solution that has worked well in other games (e.g. Terraforming Mars, see attached screenshots) is to use blank cards and render the text on top rather than rasterizing it within the image. This achieves high quality at any scale/zoom level but requires a bit of work to implement properly.
In any case, switching to higher resolution assets would provide most of the same benefit and I imagine it would be much easier to get done. Hoping to see this happen and I would be happy to help with the technical work if needed. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v18.3
Historial de informes
Engade a este informe
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
