• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou

End of game scoring: Score totals should be 23 for one player, 22 for the other (not 22-22)

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

End of game scoring: Score totals should be 23 for one player, 22 for the other (not 22-22)

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?

End of game scoring: Score totals should be 23 for one player, 22 for the other (not 22-22)

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?

End of game scoring: Score totals should be 23 for one player, 22 for the other (not 22-22)

• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

End of game scoring: Score totals should be 23 for one player, 22 for the other (not 22-22)

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

End of game scoring: Score totals should be 23 for one player, 22 for the other (not 22-22)

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

I've already submitted this as a comment within boardgamearena.com/bug?id=139314, but since that record has been marked "implemented", I believe the following was missed. I've marked this new report as not following the rules because I think the equal turns option should ONLY be implemented if it also takes the following into account:

I'd like to suggest another adjustment to the "Equal Turns" rule:

Determine the outcome (i.e the winner and rank of other players) based on the number of objectives that each player has completed after everyone has placed the same number of tiles (regardless of how many tokens are being used in the game). Without this adjustment, players can tie even when one or more of them could have played additional tokens (if they'd had them).

Here's an example: imgur.com/a/qwLrTOL
(from boardgamearena.com/table?table=610766824)

With the physical game, I would use some other token (coins, or an unused color token) to cover additional completed objectives on the tiles. It is not unusual for physical copies of games to allow for token substitutions.

• Cal é o teu navegador?