#142853: "Conflict Fatigue dominance adjustment is not reset after Dominance Check"
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Por favor revisa se xa hai un informe sobre o mesmo tema
De ser afirmativo, por favor VOTA por este informe. Aos informes con máis votos se lles da PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrición detallada
-
• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
-
• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
-
• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
-
• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
-
• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
-
• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
-
• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
-
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
Yes; the relevant moves are 161 and 178.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
The Conflict Fatigue card was purchased by a player in move 161; the Afghans became dominant with a two-piece lead over the Russians. A Dominance Check was purchased, the Afghans were scored accordingly and the map was reset, but the Afghans remained dominant when two of their pieces returned to the board. The dominance requirement should have been reset to a four piece advantage after the check following Conflict Fatigue was resolved.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Safari v17.6
Historial de informes
Engade a este informe
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
