• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?

• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

The card works but the interface is currently confusing. I like having all three options available at once, it makes it fast and easy to use. It can be improved, though.

When Vill-Villaremen's action is presented to the player, there are three options. The far left option (Play card) needs to be distinct from the other two, as it isn't immediately obvious to the player that this is the option to "not" use Vill's ability.

It could be larger, or given its own image (Vill's card with a red slash through it, or something) so that it matches the size of the other two. It could be a simply question and prompt above the other two options to separate it and make it more visible and easier to understand as "not" using Vill's action.

Another option is implementing a two step process: first the player is given the option of using Vill's action, then, if they say yes, they are shown the card options available. If they simply select not to use Vill's action then the game can proceed.

• Cal é o teu navegador?