Todos os informes
Informes de zookeepers_displayed
#124258: "No actions"
implemented: Esta suxestión xa foi implementada
1
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Suxestión: na miña opinión, esta idea pode mellorar moito a implementación do xogo
Descrición detallada
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
My opponent was somehow able click his way into a situation when he had 0 resources AND he fired all the keepers along with the animals that he had saved, thus leaving him with no means of gaining more resources.
I am sure all the moves were legal and nobody would probably do that in a physical game, but in a digital game a player can be left with essential no moves.
An option will be a warning before a player discard their last keeper with saved animals?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v125
Historial de informes
18. Mai 2024 7:21 • parsonii • Esta suxestión aínda non foi analizada polos desenvolvedores:
18. Mai 2024 17:13 • Fearinn • Os desenvolvedores cren que é unha boa idea e teñen a intención de traballar nela:
We've antecipated this scenario. It should've been blocked by an error, so this is actually a bug. I'm gonna investigate it, thanks!
18. Mai 2024 20:15 • Fearinn • Esta suxestión xa foi implementada:
After some investigation, I'm almost certain there was no bug. What most likely happened is that your opponent quit the match when he had 1 resource in hand. When a player quits, all their resources are returned to the bag. As his turns will be automatically skipped, there would be no actions anyway.
I've just added a message to make it more clear when that's the case.
Please let me know if you have any info that indicates I'm wrong.
I've just added a message to make it more clear when that's the case.
Please let me know if you have any info that indicates I'm wrong.
18. Mai 2024 20:43 • parsonii • Esta suxestión xa foi implementada:
You are right. He did have one resource remaining when he quit the game. But one white resource would not allow him to save an animal and he had no means of gaining more resources to get himself out of that situation.
I am really thinking more along the line that the game needs to have a situation that will prevent that or some mechanism for a player to potentially dig themselves out of that hole. Maybe gain min 1 resource or a rule that a player may not discard the last keeper with animal saved.
In either case, it's more a game mechanism than the implementation. Thank you for looking into it. :)
I am really thinking more along the line that the game needs to have a situation that will prevent that or some mechanism for a player to potentially dig themselves out of that hole. Maybe gain min 1 resource or a rule that a player may not discard the last keeper with animal saved.
In either case, it's more a game mechanism than the implementation. Thank you for looking into it. :)
18. Mai 2024 22:39 • Fearinn • Esta suxestión xa foi implementada:
One white resource would allow him to save an animal, due to the conservation fund rule (1 white = 2 red/green). As long as the implementation works as expected, the players will never become unable to continue the match.
That doesn't mean they can't put themselves in very bad situations, but I guess that's part of the game.
That doesn't mean they can't put themselves in very bad situations, but I guess that's part of the game.
Engade a este informe
Por favor engade aquí calquera cousa que sexa relevante para reproducir este erro ou entender a túa suxestión:
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
