#118702: "Implement Card Sorting: Either Fixed Sort or Player Sort"
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Por favor revisa se xa hai un informe sobre o mesmo tema
De ser afirmativo, por favor VOTA por este informe. Aos informes con máis votos se lles da PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrición detallada
-
• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?
-
• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
-
• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. -
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
I think it would be helpful to have the ability to rearrange hand cards or at the very least for the implementation to provide a set organization with some kind of clumping of cards based on effect. 15 cards each with two different effects (though some double up) can be a bit hard to parse.
The order currently appears to be somewhat random, it's nice to have them be more organized when browsing options (or to find a card you want). I don't know if letting players organize them individually would be hard to implement, but some kind of default organization would be helpful even without the ability for the player to rearrange them.
In the physical game, I tend to clump them into three batches as follows.
RESOURCE: [Clay Worker, Wood Cutter, Fuel Collector, Charcoal Burner, Slash-and-Burn Farmer, Water Carrier]
TERRAIN: [Pond Builder, Fish Farmer, Forest Manager, Pit Worker]
BUILD: [Cultivator, Builder, Supplier, Carpenter, Feudal Lord]
The order within the clumping matters less, but in the above I have roughly organized each card to have an overlapping effect with at least one adjacent card, e.g. in resources: Clay->Clay/Wood->Wood->Wood/Charcoal->Charcoal/Charcoal->Charcoal/Food. Where possible, there is some contiguity across clumps: the cultivator comes after the last in card in the terrain clump and the Pond using terrain cards come after the water carrier.
There probably is no perfect organization due to the overlapping effect types and some might prefer organizing by resource, etc..., but I think some kind of organization would be useful.
This is very much a Quality of Life feature that becomes less important with experience, so much lower priority than bugs and the like, but it'd be nice to see someday. g of cards based on effect. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Google Chrome v123
Historial de informes
[Clay-/Clay]->[Wood/Wood]->[Wood/Charcoal]->[Charcoal/Charcoal]->[Charcoal/Food]
Engade a este informe
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
