#117504: "Pudding is incorrectly awards negative points"
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Por favor revisa se xa hai un informe sobre o mesmo tema
De ser afirmativo, por favor VOTA por este informe. Aos informes con máis votos se lles da PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrición detallada
-
• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
-
• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. -
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
Yes, end of the game. Just visit the table for the end stats.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
boardgamearena.com/1/sushigoparty?table=487300023
Pudding awards +6 to the player with the most, and -6 to the player with the least, including zero. The table had players with 0, 1, and 3 puddings.
According to the end screen table calculations popup, the players with 0 and 1 both got a -6 penalty, when only the player with 0 should have gotten the penalty.
Accounting for it properly would have changed the outcome of the game, awarding me a win by +5 points. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit)
Historial de informes
BGG's interpretation(?):
The player(s) with the least number of pudding cards in their tableau, and any player(s) with no collected pudding cards lose 6 points.
Everyone else's interpretation (as far as I'm aware):
The player with the least number of pudding cards loses 6 points, where having zero pudding cards is considered less than having one pudding card.
As far as I can tell, the "including 0" is just to note that you can't get out of the penalty by "not playing" and avoiding collecting any pudding cards.
The example the rules give is:
> Example: Chris has 4 pudding cards,
> Meredith has 2, and Kerry and Andrew
> have 1. Chris scores 6 points. Kerry and
> Andrew both lose 6 points.
This suggests to me BGA is incorrect, otherwise they're being self-inconsistent by treating 1 vs 0 differently from 2 vs 1.
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Engade a este informe
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
