#115338: "allow players to lock in their split before others have discarded"
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Por favor revisa se xa hai un informe sobre o mesmo tema
De ser afirmativo, por favor VOTA por este informe. Aos informes con máis votos se lles da PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrición detallada
-
• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?
-
• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. -
• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
In the current implementation, if any players are above their maximum hand size, all play is paused until all of those players have discarded. But, crucially, what they choose to discard has no bearing on any other players' decisions. All we see is that someone had too many cards, and then they had just enough.
I propose: when I have already or don't need to discard, I should be able to lock in my split. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
Historial de informes
This would speed up the game without changing anyone's available information. Lean into the simultaneous action selection.
Unfortunately, the suggestion would require a sizeable rewrite of much of the game's code. Maybe doable in development or even alpha, but that was over a year ago.
Engade a este informe
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
