• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?

• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?

• Cal é o teu navegador?

• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.

I have two suggestions that I think would be nice to speed things up, particularly for asynchronous play.

1. Currently, each player has a turn to use their megastructures, then each player has a turn to pay for their authority level. It would be nice if instead, player A had a turn to use their megastructures and to pay for their authority level, then player B, etc. as it would mean several less turns to wait for in an async game and the gameplay is not affected. (I also think it should just be simultaneous or at least have a configuration option to be simultaneous, but that has already been rejected. Why not give players the option to configure it that way if they don't think it matters?)

2. When a player can't pay for their authority level, they still have to click Confirm even though there is no possible action they can take. In that situation the game should just progress - there's no reason to wait for the player to make a move when there is no possible move they can make.

• Cal é o teu navegador?