#110152: "implement a better default player order algorithm"
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Por favor revisa se xa hai un informe sobre o mesmo tema
De ser afirmativo, por favor VOTA por este informe. Aos informes con máis votos se lles da PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrición detallada
-
• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. -
• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes unha captura de pantalla deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar un servizo de hospedaxe de imaxes da túa elección (snipboard.io, por exemplo) para subila e copiar/pegar o enlace aquí. É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. -
• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. -
• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?
-
• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. -
• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes unha captura de pantalla deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar un servizo de hospedaxe de imaxes da túa elección (snipboard.io, por exemplo) para subila e copiar/pegar o enlace aquí.
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes unha captura de pantalla deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar un servizo de hospedaxe de imaxes da túa elección (snipboard.io, por exemplo) para subila e copiar/pegar o enlace aquí. É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
When a group plays a series of rematches, rather than rotating the first player initiative and keeping every player in the same ring, BGA should just exclude the previous first player when choosing a new one, and then assign everyone else's position at random.
This would satisfy a number of important criteria:
- it works for all games, whatever the number of players is so that it can be cleanly implemented and easily explained
- it would alternate the first player turns of 2 player games, which was the original and very popular reason for this work
- it would not have Player Y follow Player X in game after game after game
I already started a discussion thread on this topic here: forum.boardgamearena.com/viewtopic.php?p=164654#p164654
There I give more detail on the status quo, motivation for a change, pros and cons, and even a pseudocode implementation. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
Historial de informes
Engade a este informe
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- Se tes unha captura de pantalla deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar un servizo de hospedaxe de imaxes da túa elección (snipboard.io, por exemplo) para subila e copiar/pegar o enlace aquí.
