#102878: "No color won, the game should have been a complete draw, but it still went to normal tie breakers"
Sobre qué é este informe?
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Qué aconteceu? Por favor selecciona debaixo
Por favor revisa se xa hai un informe sobre o mesmo tema
De ser afirmativo, por favor VOTA por este informe. Aos informes con máis votos se lles da PRIORIDADE!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Descrición detallada
-
• Por favor, copia e pega a mensaxe de erro que ves na túa pantalla, se houbera algún.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Por favor, explica o que querías facer, o que fixeche e o que pasou
End game.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
End game.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué había na pantalla cando se quedou bloqueado? (mensaxe de erro?, pantalla en blanco?, unha parte da interface do xogo?)
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué parte das regras non se cumpriron na adaptación da BGA?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• é visible a violación das regras na repetición? Se o é, en que número de movemento?
End game.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Qué acción de xogo querías realizar?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Qué é o que tratache de facer para activar esta acción do xogo?
End game.
-
• Qué sucedeu cando o fixeche (a mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• En que paso do xogo ocorreu o problema (cal foi a instrucción actual do xogo)?
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• Qué sucedeu cando tratache de facer unha acción de xogo (mensaxe de erro, mensaxe na barra de estado do xogo, ...)?
End game.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, describe o problema de visualización. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor, copia/pega o texto amosado en inglés no canto do teu idioma. Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. -
• É este o texto dispoñible no sistema de tradución? Se é así, foi traducido fai máis de 24 horas?
End game.
• Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
-
• Por favor explica a túa suxestión de maneira precisa e concisa para que sexa o máis sinxelo posible entender o que queres dicir.
No color won the war.
Black 3, Blue 3, Red 3
Black Axe 2, Blue Axe 2, Red Axe 2
Black Flag 2, Blue Axe 1, Red Axe 2
Black and Red were tied therefore the game can't have a player winner. Yet my opponent who had less stones still won. It should have been a complete draw as a player wasn't allowed to win per the rules.
From the rulebook:
6. The Winning Faction
If all players Negotiate consecutively
on their turn, the game ends and the
faction that rules the most areas wins.
The first tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the axe.
The second tiebreaker is the faction
with the most stones on the flag.
If all else fails, no one wins.
So you can't even determine a player winner if there's no faction winner first. • Cal é o teu navegador?
Mozilla v5
Historial de informes
boardgamegeek.com/thread/3002700/question-no-one-wins-and-losing-faction
And here is where she says all these rule clarifications are correct
boardgamegeek.com/filepage/252122/turncoats-rules-end-game-clarifications
Which includes this clarification:
2. WINNING FACTION
The Faction that rules the most areas wins.
If tied, the tied faction with the most stone on the axe wins.
If still tied, the still tied faction with the most stone on the flag wins.
If still tied, there is no winning faction and there is no winning player.
This game ended the same way, it shouldn't be that easy to force a win, just end the game on a color tie with less stones?
boardgamegeek.com/thread/3161778/all-factions-lose-no-player-wins-or-least-stones-w/page/1
Your bug has probably been fixed already, or was linked to a temporary failure of BGA service.
In any case, when filling a bug report, make sure to have an explicit title linked to the incident (ex: with error message), so other players can recognize it and vote for it.
Engade a este informe
- Outro DI de mesa / ID de movemento
- Premer F5 resolveu o problema?
- Apareceu o problema varias veces? Tódalas veces? Aleatoriamente?
- Se tes un pantallazo deste erro (boa práctica), podes usar Imgur.com para subilo e copiar/pegar a ligazón aquí.
